People who put themselves under western frontier of scientific research has rejected and ignored almost everything that can not be perceived by their senses. Any researches are taken as superstitious and not valid if they are not fulfilling the causes and effects theory. With the rejection of non-Western scientific concepts as inferior at best and inaccurate at worst, the members of conventional medical research, try to announce to the world that there are indeed major risk of alternative medication therapies.
However, biomedical research can not clarify many phenomena that influence doctors in the process of caring healing in alternative area. Treatments such as acupuncture or homeopathy have been successful in a normal or clinic that can not be explained by the effect of the modern scientific biomedical model. But on the other hand many have tried to challenge the results, rather than changing and perfecting the scientific model.
It is estimated that 80 % of our reality can not be recognized by our five senses. When the researchers fixed and limit their work to five senses, they will face difficulties in understanding how human energy fields, thoughts as energy form, mediation and the healing power of prayer.
Formal conventional medication also conceives that in every technique, materials, and procedures must accept the test of double blind study. Double blind study of a simple procedure or substance in isolated, controlled conditions, results and actions during the procedure or substance known to investigate inactive. This approach presumes that some factors that cause disease, and that these factors can only be seen and not context.
This is different approach from alternative medicine perspective. This group believes that no single factor as the main cause. Several factors contribute to illness and there are needs from various works and intervention to promote healing. The double blind method is incompetent to solve the complexity and variation of these issues.
While many other alternative medication may not have much quantitative studies or modern standard researches, but their researches are not experimental in nature. This method is based on well-developed sense of observation and clinical experience guided by the explanatory models. It is true that new drugs must pass official proof of clinical efficacy and safety before the implementation. Their method to testing, enforcement, procedures and treatments are not limited in the same way. Western doctors and physicians are using the well-developed clinical trial and observation, same like their colleagues in alternative medicine area. Thus, the argument is really turns into a cultural bias rather than the real proof scientific method.
Meticulous and over obsessed documentation of all claims made by the several treatments therapies are out of the scope of this guide. The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine National Institutes of Health has been ordered to initiate evaluation of alternative therapies. The evaluation is performed mostly carried out in universities and medical schools and the public that the information available. There may be a waiting period for new discoveries in the area of quantum physics and neuro-psychology prior alternative medicine get accepted and to be understood by the biomedical model. The success of alternative medication therapies should be discussed by the public.